Using AI well at the individual level is necessary. It isn't sufficient. Somewhere in your organisation, AI is already running through two or three departments — informally, without a policy, without anyone checking outputs against anything. Programme 2 is about building the controls, the audit trail, and the policy that make that use defensible — and answering the harder question underneath all three: what do you want your board to say about this in two years? This programme prepares leaders to have that answer before someone else asks for it.
Duration: 1 day
Trusted Expertise: Classroom-based, lab-driven programme, built to ISO/IEC 42001 and Malaysia's PDPA 2010 — the same standards your policy will be measured against.
Target Audience: This programme is for professionals who've completed Programme 1 and are ready to move from personal risk practice to organisational accountability. It is suitable for:
HR/L&D leaders shaping how AI is adopted across teams
Compliance and risk owners accountable for what AI produces
Department heads who'll be asked to answer for AI use in their function
Programme 1 attendance is required. This isn't an entry point — it's where accountability begins.
Why This Course? Most organisations don't have an AI governance problem because they ignored AI. They have one because adoption outran policy — one convenient shortcut, one ungoverned tool, one department at a time. Without an audit log or a documented process, there's often no way to answer a client or regulator who asks how an AI-assisted decision was reached. And because the habits sit with the tool rather than the team, switching platforms next year means starting from zero again. Programme 2 exists to fix the part Programme 1 doesn't reach: not which AI tool your organisation uses, but whether it can defend how that tool gets used — regardless of which one it is next. event.mpc.org.my/genai
Course Objectives: Participants will be prepared to:
Find out where ISO/IEC 420