Brouky logo

Global startup ecosystem overview

Global VC Data

Measuring Global Startup Ecosystems

US VC Growth (2024 → 2025)
+67.9B $ (47.2%)
Top Performer (density)
Israel — 1,379 units per 1M
Countries > US (2024)
Israel, Singapore, Estonia
Europe (2024 vs US)
Loading…

Key Headlines

  • Ireland — Europe leader (2025): Loading…
  • China is the rare case where “Asia dominance” is real — but only in totals: China ≈44.6% of Asia VC and of startup-years; only 33.1 units per 1M (~9.5% of US intensity).
  • “Cost advantage” alone doesn’t create a startup continent: Brazil has a large cost lever (3.28×) but only 18.46 units per 1M.
  • Nordics: the quickest counterexample to “Europe is always far behind”: Sweden: 277.3 units/1M; Finland: 247.6 units/1M (US baseline 348.5).
  • US Global Dominance: US remains dominant — 609.56 VC per person and ~349 units/1M in 2025
  • Startup cost gap: Cheapest — Vietnam $389.281 vs Most expensive — Switzerland $2,110.546
  • Poland — surprisingly bad score: 15 units per million — Very low share of economic output allocated to startup funding (4.37% of US baseline).
Phase 1

Nominal Venture Capital

This chart shows the raw amount of venture capital invested in each country, measured in nominal U.S. dollars.

It answers a simple question: Where does venture capital flow?

This is the most common way startup ecosystems are compared — but it is only the starting point. Nominal VC tells us how much money moved, not what that money can actually build in different economic environments.

Nominal VC does not account for population size, economic scale, or local costs.

Venture Capital by Country

Compare venture capital investments across countries

North America
Europe
Asia
Oceania
South America

USA vs. Rest of the World

Venture capital investment comparison

Global Share
USA: NaN% | World: NaN%

USA

VS

Rest of World

USA vs Rest of World

The United States dominates in absolute capital, but not in startup intensity. Despite attracting roughly two-thirds of global VC dollars, the U.S. devotes a smaller share of total economic effort to startups than several smaller economies.

USA Market Share
NaN%
Total Global VC
$0.0M
World Market Share
NaN%

Europe vs China vs India

Comparing real startup capacity across major innovation hubs

Europe ≈ China in Real Startup Capacity

Europe's combined startup capacity is roughly equal to China's once adjusted for purchasing power — despite China appearing larger in nominal VC.

When we account for what venture capital can actually buy in each economy, Europe's distributed ecosystem matches China's centralized power. India, while smaller in nominal terms, punches above its weight due to dramatically lower startup costs.

Europe

Nominal VC:$0
PPP-Adjusted:$0
PPP Multiplier: —

China

Nominal VC:$0
PPP-Adjusted:$0
PPP Multiplier: —

India

Nominal VC:$0
PPP-Adjusted:$0
PPP Multiplier: —

European Venture Capital Landscape

Comparing VC investment across 0 European countries

Phase 2

VC Relative to Economic Scale

A billion dollars means very different things in different economies.

To understand whether venture capital is economically significant, we compare VC to the size of each country's economy using nominal GDP. This shows whether startups are a rounding error or a meaningful economic force at the national level.

In this phase, capital is translated into Equivalent People — the number of average citizens whose annual economic output equals the VC invested.

This reframes venture capital from abstract dollars into human-scale economic effort.

VC ÷ GDP per capita =Equivalent People

GDP-Based Metrics

Select a metric to visualize venture capital relative to economic scale

Phase 3

Real Startup Capacity (PPP-Adjusted)

Startups do not consume GDP — they consume teams.

The same dollar buys very different amounts of real startup activity depending on local salaries, rent, and operating costs. To compare ecosystems fairly, we adjust venture capital using purchasing power and a standardized benchmark: the Startup Unit.

A Startup Unit is an efficiency parameter representing the annual funding cost of a representative early-stage startup based on local salary data and overhead. These metrics normalize VC investment by purchasing power, revealing the actual startup capacity funded in each market.

PPP-Adjusted Metrics

Select a metric to visualize real startup capacity

Startup Ecosystem Health Classification

This classification groups countries by how much real economic effort is dedicated to startups, measured as a percentage of total population output.

Startup Ecosystem Health Classification

Policy benchmark: Real percent of population output dedicated to venture capital

Policy Threshold Scale

Critical Neglect
Startups are economically negligible
Severe Underfunding
Structurally starved ecosystem
Weak Ecosystem
Marginal national relevance
Healthy
Sustainable startup activity
Frontier
Startups are a growth engine
Extreme Outlier
National economic priority
Critical Neglect
< 0.00% - 0.05%
Severe Underfunding
0.05% - 0.10%
Weak Ecosystem
0.10% - 0.20%
Healthy
0.20% - 0.50%
Frontier
0.50% - 1.00%
Extreme Outlier
1%+

Countries by Ecosystem Health

Lowest Investment Intensity

Countries with critical investment gaps requiring policy attention

Several countries remain structurally underinvested, devoting less than 0.1% of total economic effort to startups — a level where ecosystems struggle to form without policy intervention.

Investment Intensity Distribution

Countries categorized by VC investment levels

0
Critical Neglect
0.00% - 0.05%
0
Severe Underfunding
0.05% - 0.10%
0
Weak Ecosystem
0.10% - 0.20%
0
Healthy
0.20% - 0.50%
0
Frontier
0.50% - 1.00%
0
Extreme Outlier
1.00% - 1.50%

Natural Equilibrium

Most countries cluster in the Healthy range. About 40% of analyzed countries fall between 0.2% and 0.5% of population output, suggesting a natural equilibrium: too little and ecosystems stagnate, too much and economies become imbalanced.

Investment Intensity Classification

This metric shows efficiency-adjusted VC investment normalized by population size. Higher values indicate more VC funding capacity per capita after adjusting for local costs.

Minimal

0 - 25 per million

Very low VC investment intensity

Low

25 - 75 per million

Below-average VC allocation

Moderate

75 - 150 per million

Growing investment focus

Strong

150 - 300 per million

Above-average intensity

Very High

300 - 600 per million

Exceptional VC intensity

Extreme

600 - 2000 per million

Global leading intensity

VC Investment Intensity by Country

PPP-adjusted VC per million people — normalized investment allocation

Countries by Investment Intensity

Lowest Investment Intensity

Countries with critical investment gaps requiring policy attention

These countries allocate minimal VC funding relative to population. This may indicate underdeveloped venture ecosystems, limited LP capital, or policy barriers to risk capital formation.

Investment Intensity Distribution

Countries categorized by VC investment levels

0
Minimal
0 - 25 per million
0
Low
25 - 75 per million
0
Moderate
75 - 150 per million
0
Strong
150 - 300 per million
0
Very High
300 - 600 per million
0
Extreme
600 - 2000 per million

What Startup Density Reveals

Startup density measures how embedded entrepreneurship is in a country's economy and culture. High-density countries like Estonia (1,132 units/million) show that startups are accessible to a significant portion of the population, while low-density countries face structural barriers that concentrate entrepreneurship among a small elite.

This metric complements ecosystem health: a country can have high funding (healthy ecosystem) but low density (concentrated among few players), or high density but low funding per startup.

Startup Cost Analysis

Cost Efficiency vs. USA

Comparing startup unit costs across markets (USA = 1.0× baseline)

Startup Cost Ratio (vs. USA)

Higher number = cheaper. Shows cost advantage multiplier (e.g., Vietnam 4.09× = 4.09× cheaper than USA).

Cost-Efficient (>2.0× cheaper than USA)
Moderate (1.2-2.0× cheaper than USA)
High-Cost (<1.2× cheaper than USA)

Your Country

Loading country data...

Complete Country Data

Explore detailed venture capital metrics for countries worldwide

Below you'll find detailed country-level metrics showing both nominal and PPP-adjusted VC figures. The PPP-Adjusted VC column reveals what venture capital is actually worth in each country's economy, while % Population Output shows what percentage of all citizen incomes is flowing into startups.

Showing 0 of 0 countries
Country ⇅Total VC (M USD) ↓PPP Adj. VC (M USD) ⇅Population (M) ⇅VC per Capita ⇅Nominal GDP (M) ⇅GDP per Capita ⇅VC % of GDP ⇅PPP Adj. VC % ⇅GDP PPP per Capita ⇅Startup Cost (K) ⇅Cost vs USA ⇅Real % Pop Output ⇅Region