Compare · For founders

13 Best Investor Databases for Startups (2026)

13 min readData as of 2026-07-19

You can get a list of 200,000 investors for $59 a month. That has never been the hard part. The hard part is that you have time for about 40 real conversations, and nothing in a filtered spreadsheet tells you which 40 to spend them on.

This page compares the 13 products founders actually use to find and reach investors, on the four things that change the outcome of a raise: how they narrow the list, whether they explain their picks, how they get you to a human, and what they charge. Brouky is one of them, so read our own rows with that in mind. Everything else comes from vendor pricing and product pages checked on 2026-07-19.

The quick answer

Start free. Use Signal by NFX to find who in your network can introduce you to a specific partner, and OpenVC for a large filterable list with deck-open tracking. Add a ranked matcher when the free lists stop telling you who to prioritise: Raise Copilot is free in beta, Flowlie scores 40+ criteria, and Brouky ranks across 36,000+ investors with the reasoning shown. Use Foundersuite if the pipeline itself is your bottleneck.

What actually separates these products

Ignore the coverage numbers on the homepages. Four differences change how a raise goes.

The differenceWhy it decides the outcomeWho does it
Filter or rankA filtered list of 300 leaves the prioritising to you. A ranked list with reasons tells you where to start on Monday.Rank: Brouky, Flowlie, Raise Copilot. Filter: everyone else.
Whose network the intro usesSignal walks your Gmail and LinkedIn, so a first-time founder with no network sees nothing. A graph built from public co-investment history works on day one.Personal: Signal, OpenVC, Flowlie. Pre-built: Brouky.
Is the fund still deployingA fund at the end of its cycle still appears in every directory. Contacting it burns a week.Brouky (activity signals), Foundersuite partially. Most: no.
Entry cheque or any chequeA seed fund that followed winners into Series C looks late-stage in naive stage filters, so pre-seed founders get routed to funds that will never lead their round.Brouky only, in this set.

Capability matrix

The same ten capabilities applied to all 13. A fundraising CRM is close to universal, so it should not decide anything. The matching and graph columns are where these products diverge.

Capability comparison of 13 investor databases for startups
PlatformInvestor DBStartup graphDeck → matchesInvestor scoreEntry stageCo-invest graphWarm introsCRMMarket reportsCEE financials
BroukyYes: Investor databaseYes: Startup / company graphYes: Deck to ranked, explained matchesYes: Proprietary investor scoreYes: Entry-cheque stage inferenceYes: Pre-built co-investment graphYes: Warm-intro pathsPartial: Fundraising CRMYes: Country / market reportsYes: CZ / CEE statutory financials
OpenVCYes: Investor databaseNo: Startup / company graphNo: Deck to ranked, explained matchesNo: Proprietary investor scoreNo: Entry-cheque stage inferenceNo: Pre-built co-investment graphPartial: Warm-intro pathsYes: Fundraising CRMNo: Country / market reportsNo: CZ / CEE statutory financials
Signal by NFXYes: Investor databaseNo: Startup / company graphNo: Deck to ranked, explained matchesNo: Proprietary investor scoreNo: Entry-cheque stage inferencePartial: Pre-built co-investment graphYes: Warm-intro pathsPartial: Fundraising CRMNo: Country / market reportsNo: CZ / CEE statutory financials
FlowlieYes: Investor databaseNo: Startup / company graphPartial: Deck to ranked, explained matchesPartial: Proprietary investor scoreNo: Entry-cheque stage inferenceNo: Pre-built co-investment graphPartial: Warm-intro pathsYes: Fundraising CRMNo: Country / market reportsNo: CZ / CEE statutory financials
Raise CopilotPartial: Investor databaseNo: Startup / company graphYes: Deck to ranked, explained matchesPartial: Proprietary investor scoreNo: Entry-cheque stage inferenceNo: Pre-built co-investment graphNo: Warm-intro pathsYes: Fundraising CRMNo: Country / market reportsNo: CZ / CEE statutory financials
FoundersuiteYes: Investor databaseNo: Startup / company graphNo: Deck to ranked, explained matchesNo: Proprietary investor scoreNo: Entry-cheque stage inferencePartial: Pre-built co-investment graphYes: Warm-intro pathsYes: Fundraising CRMNo: Country / market reportsNo: CZ / CEE statutory financials
Visible ConnectYes: Investor databaseNo: Startup / company graphNo: Deck to ranked, explained matchesNo: Proprietary investor scoreNo: Entry-cheque stage inferenceNo: Pre-built co-investment graphNo: Warm-intro pathsYes: Fundraising CRMNo: Country / market reportsNo: CZ / CEE statutory financials
Angels PartnersYes: Investor databaseNo: Startup / company graphNo: Deck to ranked, explained matchesNo: Proprietary investor scoreNo: Entry-cheque stage inferenceNo: Pre-built co-investment graphYes: Warm-intro pathsYes: Fundraising CRMNo: Country / market reportsNo: CZ / CEE statutory financials
Angel MatchYes: Investor databaseNo: Startup / company graphNo: Deck to ranked, explained matchesNo: Proprietary investor scoreNo: Entry-cheque stage inferenceNo: Pre-built co-investment graphNo: Warm-intro pathsYes: Fundraising CRMNo: Country / market reportsNo: CZ / CEE statutory financials
Investor HuntYes: Investor databaseNo: Startup / company graphNo: Deck to ranked, explained matchesNo: Proprietary investor scoreNo: Entry-cheque stage inferenceNo: Pre-built co-investment graphNo: Warm-intro pathsNo: Fundraising CRMNo: Country / market reportsNo: CZ / CEE statutory financials
OpenStarsPartial: Investor databaseNo: Startup / company graphPartial: Deck to ranked, explained matchesNo: Proprietary investor scoreNo: Entry-cheque stage inferenceNo: Pre-built co-investment graphNo: Warm-intro pathsYes: Fundraising CRMNo: Country / market reportsNo: CZ / CEE statutory financials
PitchBobYes: Investor databaseNo: Startup / company graphPartial: Deck to ranked, explained matchesPartial: Proprietary investor scoreNo: Entry-cheque stage inferenceNo: Pre-built co-investment graphNo: Warm-intro pathsNo: Fundraising CRMNo: Country / market reportsNo: CZ / CEE statutory financials
Capital PilotPartial: Investor databaseNo: Startup / company graphNo: Deck to ranked, explained matchesYes: Proprietary investor scoreNo: Entry-cheque stage inferenceNo: Pre-built co-investment graphNo: Warm-intro pathsPartial: Fundraising CRMNo: Country / market reportsNo: CZ / CEE statutory financials
ships it · partial, weaker, or a different flavour · absent. Scroll the table sideways on a narrow screen.

Free tiers, and where they stop

Four of these cost nothing to start, and the free tiers are good enough that paying early is usually a mistake.

ProductFree tierWhere it stops
Signal by NFXEverything. No paid tier exists.Intro paths only reach as far as your own contacts. No deck AI, no scoring, no company data.
OpenVCDatabase search, deck submission, CRM, engagement tracking5 outreach messages per day. Premium ($99/mo) lifts the cap.
Foundersuite75 investors per pipelinePaid annually from $745 once the pipeline outgrows it.
Raise CopilotEverything, during betaPost-beta pricing undisclosed. Matching spans dozens of funds, not thousands.
BroukyDirectories browsable without an account, plus a free finder runDeeper analytics sit on a paid plan.

The intro problem

Cold outreach converts badly and every founder knows it, which is why intro paths became the feature everyone advertises. Two different products hide behind the same phrase.

Signal by NFX, OpenVC’s Intro Finder and Flowlie’s mapping all read your network: Gmail, LinkedIn, your inbox. If you went to Stanford and worked at Stripe, these are excellent. If you are raising a first round in Prague or Lisbon with no venture-backed colleagues, they return very little, and the gap has nothing to do with your company.

A graph built from public co-investment history behaves the opposite way. Brouky derives paths from co-investment records, team rosters and founders’ investor lists, so it can route through firms you have never met. Both are worth using. Only one of them works on day one for a founder with no network.

Pricing

Almost everything here lands between free and $99 a month. Rows marked est. carry a third-party figure, usually because vendor and reviewer pages disagree about the tiers.

Pricing comparison of 13 investor databases for startups
PlatformModelEntry priceHigher tiers
BroukyFreemium; per-entity subscriptions (VC / startup / service / org); 14-day trials; 10-seat inheritanceFree tierPremium priced per entity type
OpenVCFreemiumFree foreverPremium $99/mo or $299/yr (5 outreach/day, premium filters, Intro Finder)
Signal by NFXFree$0No paid tier
Flowlieest.In flux: self-serve moving to a Quill retainerFree, or Pro around $60/mo (some sources cite $49–99)Quill: Seed $7,500/mo, Series A $10,000/mo, Series B $15,000/mo, C+ custom; 14-day refund
Raise CopilotFree during beta$0 (beta)Post-beta pricing undisclosed
FoundersuiteFreemium plus annual plansBasic $0 (75 investors per pipeline)Silver $745/yr; Gold $1,069/yr; Platinum $1,609/yr; data room add-on
Visible Connectest.Freemium (Connect is free) plus founder SaaS and an investor productConnect free; Core $99/moGrowth $179/mo; Enterprise $399/mo; investor and portfolio side around $449/mo+ (est.); 14-day trial
Angels Partnersest.Subscription tiers plus a managed serviceBasic from $79/yr (100 investors and pings)Boost $119–179; Prime $329–499 with a LinkedIn plugin; Managed $599–999; 7-day trial
Angel Matchest.SubscriptionBasic $59/mo (up to 100 investors)Pro around $149/mo per third-party sources; alternative tiers $99 / $169 / $299 reported but unverified; 3-day trial
Investor Huntest.Freemium; Basic / Pro / Premium with export caps of 100 / 300 / 1,000Free limited tier; paid reportedly starts around $33 (est.)Exact per-tier pricing unverified
OpenStarsFreemium, credit-metered (metrics self-reported)Free (5 matches/mo)Starter $29/mo (50 matches); Pro $79/mo (unlimited plus warm intros); Enterprise custom
PitchBobOne-time payments plus subscription and white-labelAdvanced $29.90 one-timePro $49.90; Super Pro $99.90; Co-Pilot from $19.90/mo; white-label from $99/mo
Capital PilotPay per rating, plus a free matcher and an investment fundRating around £150 per applicationNavigator Search free; the Boost Fund is a £50k investment vehicle, not a subscription
Rows marked est. contain at least one third-party estimate, not a published list price. Demo-gated vendors do not publish figures. Confirm the current plan with the vendor before you buy.

The 13 platforms in detail

What each product does, where it beats the rest of this list, and the thing it leaves to you.

01

Brouky

brouky.tech

Brouky keeps investor-to-startup membership separate from investor-to-deal participation, then derives co-investment networks, syndicates, lead-follow patterns and intro paths from that graph. A 140-point score rates investor quality, and a 200-point twin-matching engine ranks investors against a deck and explains each result. Czech and CEE statutory accounts are parsed from public registries and reconciled against recorded deals.

Strongest atRanking which investors to approach, with the reasoning shown, and routing an intro through a graph you did not have to build yourself.
Doesn't doBrouky is intelligence-first, not a system of record. The CRM is light: pipeline stages and direct messaging, without automated multi-touch sequences or deck-open tracking.
Entry price
Free tier
Buyer
Two-sided: founders and investment firms (per-entity subscriptions)
02

OpenVC

openvc.app

OpenVC ships a verified investor database of roughly 16.7k funds, a free CRM, deck engagement analytics, AI outreach emails, an inbox-based Intro Finder and a slide-by-slide AI deck review. Premium at $99/mo mainly lifts the 5-per-day outreach cap. Most of the product costs nothing.

Strongest atCasting a wide net for free, with automated follow-ups and deck-open tracking.
Doesn't doFilter search rather than ranked and explained matching. Intro paths reach only as far as your own inbox, and there is no investor-side product or scoring.
Entry price
Free forever
Buyer
Founder self-serve
03

Signal by NFX

signal.nfx.com

Signal routes the strongest warm intro to any target investor by walking a 3M-edge Gmail and LinkedIn graph, across roughly 32k investor profiles. It adds curated sector and stage rankings and a light CRM. NFX runs it free as top-of-funnel for the fund.

Strongest atFinding who in your own network can introduce you to a specific partner, at no cost.
Doesn't doThe graph is personal, so it is worth only as much as your existing network. No deck AI, no scoring, no company data.
Entry price
$0
Buyer
Free (NFX community top-of-funnel)
04

Flowlie

flowlie.com

Flowlie computes a fit score from 40+ criteria covering portfolio fit and conflicts, investment velocity and partner-level behaviour. It adds a data-room one-pager, dilution tools and a deck analyzer. The company is mid-rebrand toward Quill, a back-office retainer at a very different price point.

Strongest atA US founder who wants an algorithmic fit score and the round-modelling tools around it.
Doesn't doThe fit score arrives without the reasoning or a funding benchmark behind it. Intro mapping runs on your personal network, and there is no investor-side product or CEE data.
Entry price
Free, or Pro around $60/mo (some sources cite $49–99)
Buyer
Founder self-serve, moving to a premium concierge
05

Raise Copilot

raisecopilot.com

Upload a deck and Gemini scores it slide by slide, then 30 to 50 investors come back scored on fit with written reasons. Committed tickets flow into an integrated cap table. The product is free while it stays in beta.

Strongest atA fast, free, explained first pass on a deck when you have no list at all.
Doesn't doThe investor database is crowd-sourced, matching spans dozens rather than tens of thousands of funds, and there is no co-investment graph or intro routing.
Entry price
$0 (beta)
Buyer
Founder self-serve
06

Foundersuite

foundersuite.com

Foundersuite pairs an investor database in the 216k–230k range with a mature fundraising CRM, deck tracking, investor updates and a Get Intro feature. It also serves emerging GPs raising their own funds, though founders remain the main buyer.

Strongest atRunning the raise itself: pipeline, updates, documents, follow-ups.
Doesn't doThe database is a flat contact list rather than a scored graph. No matching engine, no investor score, no stage inference.
Entry price
Basic $0 (75 investors per pipeline)
Buyer
Founder self-serve
07

Visible Connect

visible.vc

Visible is strongest after the round closes: investor updates, dashboards, data rooms and pipeline tracking. The free Connect directory lists roughly 19k funds and withholds contact emails by design. The investor product handles portfolio monitoring.

Strongest atReporting to investors you already have, on a schedule, without building it yourself.
Doesn't doNo matching engine, no scoring, no relationship graph and no statutory data. The directory is a lead magnet rather than the product.
Entry price
Connect free; Core $99/mo
Buyer
Two-sided
08

Angels Partners

angelspartners.com

Angels Partners sells access to an investor list with campaign tooling, a LinkedIn plugin on higher tiers, and a managed tier where their team runs outreach for you. Pricing sources disagree on the exact tier boundaries.

Strongest atFounders who would rather pay someone to run the outreach than run it themselves.
Doesn't doA flat contact list with no scoring, no relationship graph and no matching engine.
Entry price
Basic from $79/yr (100 investors and pings)
Buyer
Founder self-serve plus managed service
09

Angel Match

angelmatch.io

Angel Match sells filtered access to investor contacts with a light CRM on top. Published tier structures vary between the vendor site and third-party reviews, so confirm the current plan before buying.

Strongest atGetting a contact list quickly without an annual commitment.
Doesn't doContacts only. No scoring, no graph, no matching, no intro paths.
Entry price
Basic $59/mo (up to 100 investors)
Buyer
Founder self-serve
10

Investor Hunt

investorhunt.co

Investor Hunt is the thinnest product in the set and the cheapest: a large contact list, filters and an export cap that scales with the tier. There is no CRM layer.

Strongest atBuying a bulk contact export on a small budget.
Doesn't doNo CRM, no scoring, no graph, no matching. Export caps bite quickly.
Entry price
Free limited tier; paid reportedly starts around $33 (est.)
Buyer
Founder self-serve
11

OpenStars

openstars.io

OpenStars meters matching by credits, from 5 free per month up to unlimited on Pro, and bundles a CRM and community. Its coverage and performance numbers are self-reported, with little third-party verification available.

Strongest atA very cheap monthly plan when you only need a handful of matches.
Doesn't doThin database, self-reported metrics, and no graph, scoring or stage inference.
Entry price
Free (5 matches/mo)
Buyer
Founder self-serve plus community
12

PitchBob

pitchbob.io

PitchBob generates decks, business plans and outreach documents from a chat, then matches the idea against a top-50 drawn from a 150k-investor database. One-time pricing from $29.90 puts it below every subscription on this list. Accelerators white-label it.

Strongest atTurning a raw idea into a deck and a first investor list, cheaply, in one sitting.
Doesn't doMatching arrives unexplained. No relationship graph, no investor score, no statutory data. The buyer is earlier-stage than the rest of this set.
Entry price
Advanced $29.90 one-time
Buyer
Consumer and prosumer, plus B2B2C
13

Capital Pilot

capitalpilot.com

Capital Pilot produces a roughly 24-page dual rating on a startup's investability, then auto-invests in top-rated companies through its Boost Fund. A free Crunchbase-powered matcher sits alongside. Ratings are human-assisted rather than fully computed.

Strongest atA UK startup that wants a third-party investability verdict it can show investors.
Doesn't doIt rates startups, not investors, covers the UK only, and rents its underlying data.
Entry price
Rating around £150 per application
Buyer
Rating agency plus micro-VC

Above $99 a month you are buying a service

Three products in this table break the founder price ceiling, and none of them is selling software at that price. Angels Partners runs your outreach for $599 to $999. Flowlie’s Quill retainer starts at $7,500 a month for a seed-stage company and reaches $15,000 at Series B, which buys a back office rather than a database. Visible’s investor product sits near $449 a month and sells to funds, not founders.

If you are paying more than $99 a month for a list of investors, check what the extra buys. Sometimes a managed service is the right call when you have no time. It is not a better database.

Which to pick

First-time founder, no network, pre-seed

Signal returns little for you, which is the whole problem. Start with a ranked list that does not depend on who you know, then use OpenVC’s free tier to run the outreach. Our guide to finding investors covers the sequence.

Second-time founder, strong network

Signal by NFX first, every time. Your existing graph is the asset, and it costs nothing to mine it. Add a matcher for the funds nobody in your network reaches.

Raising in Europe or CEE

US-built databases thin out fast outside the US and UK. Brouky covers 130+ countries and holds Czech statutory filings from the public registry. Country pages show the coverage per market before you commit to anything.

Pipeline is the bottleneck

Foundersuite. It is the most complete fundraising CRM in this set, with updates, documents and follow-ups, at $745 to $1,609 a year.

You have a deck and 20 minutes

Raise Copilot is free in beta, scores the deck slide by slide and returns 30 to 50 explained matches. Small universe, fast answer.

Where Brouky fits

Brouky ranks investors for a specific startup across 36,000+ investors and shows the reasoning behind each one, using 100,000+ recorded funding rounds and 230K+ investor-to-deal relationships. Two things here are unusual: intro paths come from a pre-built co-investment graph rather than your inbox, and stage matching uses entry-cheque inference rather than raw participation counts.

The honest gap: Brouky has no automated multi-touch follow-up sequences and no deck-open tracking. OpenVC does both, and some founders run it alongside for exactly that reason. Our head-to-head with OpenVC goes through the trade in detail.

Investor rather than founder? The investor-side comparison covers PitchBook, Dealroom, Harmonic and Affinity. The full landscape puts all 24 products in one matrix.

Method

Prices and capabilities come from vendor product pages, pricing pages and third-party reviews, collected on 2026-07-19. Estimated figures are marked. Vendors change pricing without notice, and several of these have conflicting tier structures in circulation. Tell us if something here is wrong.

Frequently asked questions

What is the best free investor database for startups?

Signal by NFX costs nothing and has no paid tier: roughly 32k investor profiles plus intro paths over a 3-million-edge network graph. OpenVC keeps most of its product free, including a verified database of about 16.7k funds, a CRM and deck engagement tracking. Foundersuite's free tier caps at 75 investors per pipeline. Brouky's investor, startup and founder directories are browsable without an account. Running two free tools before paying for anything is the sensible order.

How much do investor databases cost?

Most sit between free and $99 a month. OpenVC Premium is $99/mo or $299/yr. Angel Match Basic is $59/mo. OpenStars runs $29 to $79/mo. Visible Core is $99/mo. Foundersuite charges annually at $745 to $1,609. PitchBob sells one-time from $29.90. Above that band you are buying a service rather than software: Angels Partners' managed tier runs $599 to $999, and Flowlie's Quill retainer starts at $7,500 a month.

Is a bigger investor database better?

No, and the counts are misleading anyway. Foundersuite lists 216,000 to 230,000 investors depending on the page. You will contact maybe 60. What decides the outcome is whether the 60 are the right 60, which depends on stage fit, sector fit, whether the fund is still deploying, and whether you can reach a partner. A database of 200,000 contacts with no ranking leaves that work to you.

What is the difference between filtering and matching?

Filtering narrows a list by stage, geography, ticket size and sector, then hands you an unordered result. You still decide who to approach first. Matching ranks the result by predicted fit and shows the reasoning. OpenVC, Angel Match, Investor Hunt and Foundersuite filter. Flowlie, Raise Copilot and Brouky rank. The distinction matters most when the filtered list still has 300 names on it.

Do investor databases include contact emails?

It varies, and this is worth checking before you pay. Investor Hunt and Angel Match sell contact access outright. OpenVC routes outreach through its own product with a daily cap. Visible Connect withholds contact emails from its free directory by design. Signal by NFX gives you an intro path to a person rather than a cold email address, which converts better anyway.

Can I use several of these at once?

Founders often do, and they layer rather than duplicate. A common stack: Signal by NFX for intro paths, one ranked matcher to decide who to prioritise, and one CRM to track the pipeline. Paying for two products that both sell filtered contact lists adds nothing.

Where do these prices come from?

Published pricing pages, checked 2026-07-19. Rows marked "est." carry a third-party figure because the vendor does not publish one, or because vendor and reviewer pages disagree. Angel Match, Angels Partners, Investor Hunt and Flowlie all have conflicting tier structures in circulation. Confirm the current plan before you buy.

Get your ranked shortlist

Submit your startup URL and see investors ranked by fit, with the reasoning behind each one. Free to run.